As was the case last time, the leads will be chosen by the community, then the leads will choose who will become a reviewer.
On this post, we will use polls for informal voting. If the polls have a clear outcome, they will be considered as the consensus, with formal affirmation later through the grants program renewal PTIP.
If the vote in this post is contentious, there will be a more formal voting process through Snapshot.
Before voting, please inform yourself by reading the candidates’ applications, which are linked under their name.
Deputy lead candidates
Only Torgin applied for this role, so he is the only candidate:
I definitely get that perspective and was very thankful to @SmartInvestor for applying. He is certainly a very worthy candidate. I did however think it would be better to have someone start in the role of has already served as a reviewer.