I am against fragmenting liquidity between uniswap and sushiswap for reasons stated in previous posts. It is not in the interest of new users. There is no subset of trader that trades on sushiswap and not uniswap but there is in the vice versa case. It creates friction for no apparent benefit?
… and I am against incentivising liquidity on quickswap on polygon for reasons stated:
and
It also strikes me as odd that people would vote to incentivise POOL/USDC liquidity pair while at the same time supporting the drip for USDT instead of proposing a new pool for USDC or incentivising liquidity for POOL/USDT. I agree with @underthesea , new pools should be the focus, DEFI predominately uses USDC over USDT by a long way. Maybe we are caught in some cognitive dissonance since USDC is our flagship product on ethereum. It strikes me as irrational any way. Not too keen about putting too much funds towards this either. Ethereum is very usable and has been for many months.